Blood-Pressure Management in Post-Cardiac Arrest Care: A Review of the BOX Trial
Main Article Content
Abstract
This trial examined the optimal mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) target for comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In a double-blind, parallel-group design, the study enrolled Danish ICU patients who had a sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest. Participants were randomized to a higher MAP target (> 77 mmHg) or a standard MAP target (> 63 mmHg). Temperature control was maintained at 36°C for 24 hours, with mechanical ventilation and sedation. Neurological outcomes were assessed by attending physicians. The intervention protocol adopted a three-stage approach for MAP achievement, utilizing volume resuscitation, norepinephrine, and dopamine infusion as needed. The pharmacologic circulatory support was quantified using the vasopressor–inotropic score. The study concluded that there was no significant difference in the rates of death or severe disability between the two MAP target groups, suggesting that a higher MAP target does not improve the neurological outcome. The strengths of the trial include its methodological rigor and low attrition rate, with limitations related to its generalizability due to the single-country, two-centers setup.
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All open access articles published in the journal are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (Creative Commons Attribution-Non-commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is properly cited and distributed under the same license (ShareAlike). Under Creative Commons, authors retain copyright in their articles.
References
Kjaergaard J, Møller JE, Schmidt H, Grand J, Mølstrøm S, Borregaard B, et al. Blood-Pressure Targets in Comatose Survivors of Cardiac Arrest. New England Journal of Medicine. 2022 Oct 20;387(16):1456–66.
Belletti A, Lerose CC, Zangrillo A, Landoni G. Vasoactive-Inotropic Score: Evolution, Clinical Utility, and Pitfalls. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Oct;35(10):3067–77.
Wernovsky G, Wypij D, Jonas RA, Mayer JE, Hanley FL, Hickey PR, et al. Postoperative Course and Hemodynamic Profile After the Arterial Switch Operation in Neonates and Infants. Circulation. 1995 Oct 15;92(8):2226–35.
Jennett B. Assessment Of Outcome After Severe Brain Damage A Practical Scale. The Lancet. 1975 Mar;305(7905):480–4.
Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr 30;53(4):695–9.
van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988 May;19(5):604–7.