Lost and Found: A Case of Missing Intrauterine Contraceptive Device

Main Article Content

Saudamini Naik
Amit Naik
Kalyani Muley
Sanika Choudhary

Abstract

The common presentation of patients coming with a misplaced or migrated intrauterine copper device (IUCD) is either absence of strings, or they may become pregnant, while in majority, they may remain asymptomatic. In a developing country like India, contraception is treated like a national emergency. The IUCD is a commonly used contraceptive methods around the world, but it is associated with complications, which are rare. Uterine perforation is the most dreadful complication of the IUCD, which needs surgical intervention. A high degree of clinical suspicion is needed to identify it and Imaging is the best modality to diagnose the same. The IUCD can migrate or get misplaced within the peritoneal cavity, either partially or completely.
We present a case of a 36-year-old female with obstetric score of Para 3 with persistent, mild & dull aching pain in the lower abdomen. She had history of postpartum IUCD insertion five years ago followed by an abortion a year later. With the utilization of imaging modalities, the IUCD was seen on X-ray & Ultrasonography (USG). To remove the migrated IUCD an exploratory laparotomy using a small incision was done.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Naik, S., Naik, A., Muley, K., & Choudhary, S. (2025). Lost and Found: A Case of Missing Intrauterine Contraceptive Device. Journal of Research in Medical and Interpathy Sciences, 3(1), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.61081/jrem/3109
Section
Case Reports

References

Zakin D, Stern WZ, Rosenblatt R. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynaecol Surg. 1981;36:335–53.

Kriplani Alka, Garg Pradeep, Sharma Meenakshi, Agarwal Nutan. Laparoscopic removal of extrauterine IUCD using fluoroscopy guidance: a case report. Journal of Gynaecologic Surgery. 2005;21(1):29–30.

Key TC, Kreutner AK. Gastrointestinal complications of modern intrauterine contraceptive device. Obstet Gynecol. 1980;55:239–44.

Singh I. Intravesical cu-T emigration: an atypical and infrequent cause of vesical calculus. Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39(2):457–59. doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-9021-9.

Carson SA, Gatlin A, Mazur M. Appendiceal perforation by copper-7 intrauterine contraceptive device. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1, 1981;141(5):586–87. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(15)33284-1.

Maru Laxmi, Jharvade Hemlata, Lall Pooja Rani. An unusual case of copper-T in rectum. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2005;55(1):79–80.

Heartwell S, Schlesselman S. Risk of uterine perforation among users of intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61:31–36

Treisser A, Colau JC. Causes, diagnosis and treatment of uterine perforations by intrauterine devices. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1978;7:837–47.