The Impending Impediments of International Pandemic Treaties: A Stalemate to Combat Global Health Emergencies
Main Article Content
Abstract
The coronavirus outbreak of 2019 revealed fundamental deficiencies in worldwide health administration systems, highlighting the necessity of establishing mandatory legal structures to ensure equitable, just, and resilient responses to future pandemics. In response, the International Treaty on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response, proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO), and backed by 194 member nations, seeks to establish a robust international mechanism to safeguard public health while upholding fundamental human rights. However, tensions surrounding sovereignty, resource allocation, and enforcement mechanisms have hindered progress in finalizing and implementing this treaty. This paper critically examines the human rights implications of treaty-based pandemic responses, with a focus on lessons from the Pandemic Treaty and International Health Regulations (IHR). The discussion explores the scope, objectives, and legal complexities of these frameworks in ensuring universal access to healthcare, equitable vaccine distribution, and protection of vulnerable populations.
A key challenge lies in reconciling state sovereignty with international obligations, particularly in balancing public health measures with civil liberties. Additionally, concerns over intellectual property rights, equitable sharing of medical resources, and disparities in healthcare infrastructure remain unresolved, particularly for low and middle-income countries (LMICs). The study hypothesizes that a human rights-centered approach to pandemic governance, grounded in equity, justice, and international solidarity, is essential for fostering global health resilience. It argues for a “Framework Convention + Protocol” model, ensuring transparency, accountability, and fair resource distribution through strengthened international cooperation and legal enforcement mechanisms. By learning from past shortcomings, the international community must strive toward a pandemic treaty that prioritizes public health without compromising human rights, fostering a more inclusive and sustainable global health system. The paper concludes with policy recommendations for enhancing human rights protections in pandemic responses, calling for a multi-stakeholder approach to ensure the treaty’s success.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Attribution Non-Commercial Share-alike 4.0 International
Visit here for more details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
References
Gallo-Cajiao, E., Lieberman, S., Dolsak, N., Prakash, A., Labonté, R., Biggs, D., Morrison, T., Viens, A. M., Fuller, R.A., Aguiar, R., Fidelman, P., Watson, J. E. M., Aenishaenslin, C., & Wiktorowicz, M. (2021). A Pandemic Treaty and Wildlife Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3966292
Guilbaud, A. (2023). A Stress-Test for Global Health
Multilateralism: The Covid-19 Pandemic as Revealer and
Catalyst of Cooperation Challenges. In A. Guilbaud, F.
Petiteville, & F. Ramel (Eds.), Crisis of Multilateralism?
Challenges and Resilience (pp. 47–76). Springer
International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39671-7_3
Hampton, A.-R., Eccleston-Turner, M., Rourke, M., &
Switzer, S. (2023). Equity in the Pandemic Treaty: Access
and Benefit-Sharing as a Policy Device or a Rhetorical
Device? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 51(1), 217–
https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.59
Hassan, M. Z., Olliaro, P., Torreele, E., Caoili, J., Bockarie,
M. J., Lee, S. S., & Zumla, A. (2025). From Reaction
to Resilience: The WHO Pandemic Agreement as
a Blueprint for Global Health Equity. International
Journal of Infectious Diseases, 158. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107944
Hilty, R., Batista, P., Carls, S., Kim, D., Lamping, M.,
& Slowinski, P. R. (2021). Covid-19 and the Role of
Intellectual Property: Position Statement of the Max
Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition of
May 2021. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3841549
Hosseini, M. (2023). Building Global Health Solidarity in
a Permacrisis: Legal Impacts of a Pandemic Treaty. Irish
Studies in International Affairs, 34(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1353/isia.2023.a918356
Jiang, S., & Kumah, E. (2023). Strategizing global health
governance: Unpacking opportunities and challenges
for least developed nations within the WHO pandemic
treaty framework. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1321125.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1321125
Moon, S., & Kickbusch, I. (2021). A pandemic treaty
for a fragmented global polity. The Lancet Public
Health, 6(6), e355–e356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00103-1
Nagar, S. (2022). New international pandemic treaty:
Potential implications for clinicians worldwide.
Postgraduate Medical Journal, 98(1164), 733–734.
https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-141090
Pattanshetty, S., Inamdar, A., Poojary, P. V., Kickbusch, I.,
& Brand, H. (2024). From strategic autonomy to strategic
partnership: EU –India relations in health diplomacy.
Global Policy, 15(5), 901–914. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13459
Perehudoff, K., ’T Hoen, E., Mara, K., Balasubramaniam, T.,
Abbott, F., Baker, B., Boulet, P., Kamal-Yanni, M., Martin,
M., Munoz Tellez, V., Natsis, Y., Ortún-Rubio, V., Rathod,
S., Torrent, M., Vawda, Y., Villarroel, L., & Love, J. (2022). A
pandemic treaty for equitable global access to medical
countermeasures: Seven recommendations for sharing
intellectual property, know-how and technology. BMJ
Global Health, 7(7), e009709. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009709
Taylor, L. (2023). Covid-19: WHO treaty on future
pandemics is being watered down, warn health leaders.
BMJ, p1246. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p1246
International Covenant on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights. (1966). United Nations General
Assembly Resolution 2200A (XXI). Article 15.
Kozak, M. (2021). Competition law and the COVID-19
pandemic—Towards more room for public interest
objectives? Utrecht Law Review, 17(3), 118-129. https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.672
Labonté, R., Mohindra, K., & Schrecker, T. (2021).
A pandemic treaty, revised international health
regulatio(Guilbaud, 2023; Pattanshetty et al., 2024;
Perehudoff et al., 2022; Taylor, 2023)ns, or both?
Globalization and Health, 17, 128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00776-8
Sheerah, H. A., Alhajri, M., Garout, M., Alshahrani,
F., Sabah, S., Mahmoud, N. F., & Khanjar, I. (2024).
Navigating hurdles: A review of the obstacles facing
the development of the pandemic treaty. Journal
of Epidemiology and Global Health, 14(3), 580-590.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-024-00256-7(Jiang &
Kumah, 2023; Moon & Kickbusch, 2021; Nagar, 2022)
Nagar, S. (2022). New international pandemic treaty:
Potential implications for clinicians worldwide.
Postgraduate Medical Journal, 98(1163), 733-734.
https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-141553
Thambisetty, S., McMahon, A., McDonagh, L., Kang, H.
Y., & Dutfield, G. (2021). The TRIPS intellectual property
waiver proposal: Creating the right incentives in patent
law and politics to end the COVID-19 pandemic. SSRN
Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3851737
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change. (1992). Article 3.1. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf
Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (1948). United
Nations General Assembly Resolution 217A. Article 27.
Wenham, C., & Eccleston-Turner, M. (2024). Will the
pandemic treaty make it over the line? BMJ, 384,